Purposes of the ITBS Batteries, Levels 5-8
The purposes for using standardized achievement batteries with students in the primary
grades are much the same as those for testing in later grades. The results can provide
unique information about individual students and classes for use in instructional
planning. When used as intended, such batteries can be a useful supplement to teacher
observations about what students are able to do, and they can provide a starting
point for monitoring year-to-year student development.
Levels 5-6 (Grades K-1)
The Level 5 Battery is the first in a series of assessment tools for use in kindergarten
through high school. The emphasis of the Level 5 Battery is on academic skills found
in the early childhood curriculum. These tests are neither measures of readiness
for school nor readiness to read. Rather, they assess the extent to which a child
is cognitively prepared to begin work in the academic aspects of the curriculum.
The Level 6 Battery is similar in content and purpose to the Level 5 Battery. However,
it includes an optional reading test for use with students whose literacy skills
have begun to develop. Level 5 is generally used throughout the kindergarten year;
Level 6 is used mainly in the fall and midyear of grade 1.
Levels 7-8 (Grades 1-2)
The batteries for Levels 7 and 8 assess a broader array of skills. Social studies,
science, and sources of information tests are included, reflecting the expansion
of the early elementary curriculum in grades 1 and 2. The structures of the language
and mathematics tests also parallel a corresponding change in skill emphasis in
these subject areas in grades 1 and 2. The purpose of these batteries is to provide
information about student progress in a curriculum that expands in breadth and depth
with each additional grade level. Level 7 is generally used in the spring of grade
1 and fall of grade 2; Level 8 is used mainly in the midyear and spring of grade
2.
The development of the basic skills is a continuous process. But the rate of skills
development differs widely among children of the same age or grade. Some children
learn rapidly. Others, who may be as conscientious and highly motivated, learn more
slowly. Most children are more proficient in some skills than in others. Some children
progress more rapidly with certain methods, materials, and teaching styles than
with others. It is the challenge of identifying and providing the optimal conditions
for learning, which vary from child to child, that makes teaching such an exciting
profession. Tests that can provide dependable information about each student's most
developed and least developed skills will help the teacher to meet this challenge.
Appropriate Purposes for Testing
Some of the specific purposes that the Levels 5-8 batteries were designed to serve
are:
-
to help determine the extent to which individual students have the background and
skills needed to deal successfully with the academic aspects of an instructional
program or a planned instructional sequence;
-
to estimate the general developmental level of students so that materials and instructional
procedures may be adapted to meet individual needs;
-
to identify the areas of greatest and least development to use in planning individual
instruction for early intervention;
-
to establish a baseline of achievement information so that the monitoring of year-to-year
developmental changes may begin;
-
to provide information for making administrative programming decisions that will
accommodate developmental differences;
-
to identify areas of relative strength and weakness in the performances of groups
(e.g., classes), which may have implications for curriculum change -- either in
content or emphasis -- as well as for change in instructional procedures;
-
to provide a basis for reports to parents that will enable home and school to work
together in the students' best interests.
Some Inappropriate Purposes for Testing
The popular press and professional literature have furnished countless examples
of how test results from the early grades have been used in inappropriate ways.
All who use test scores must be made aware of the intended uses of the scores, the
limitations of the scores, and the most common misunderstandings about them. Here
are some of the most common inappropriate uses of the results from the Levels 5-8
batteries.
-
To screen children for their readiness for school enrollment. The skills
measured by these batteries are sensitive to short-term individualized instruction.
Consequently, deficiencies in any of them are more likely to be due to limited opportunity
to learn or to slow verbal development than to delayed emotional or social development.
The results from an achievement battery should never be used alone to make such
important placement decisions.
-
To retain students at a grade level. There is considerable disagreement among
educators about the appropriateness of grade retention. If a retention decision
is to be made, assessment data gathered by the teacher over a period of months is
likely to be the most relevant and accurate basis for making such a decision. It
should go without saying that test scores from an achievement battery should not
be used alone, or even be given major weight, in making a retention decision.
-
To evaluate the effectiveness of an early childhood program. The amount of
emphasis given to academic objectives in an early childhood curriculum varies substantially
among schools. All programs give attention to students' cognitive, physical, social,
and emotional development, but the balance among the curriculum components in any
given school ordinarily will depend on the nature of the students' background experiences,
the philosophy of the teachers and administrators, and the demands of the community.
Since achievement batteries can assess only a limited part of the total curriculum,
test scores alone cannot describe the relative success or effectiveness of the entire
program. Especially for programs that maintain a nonacademic or play-centered curriculum
for the early years, scores on achievement tests provide only partial information
about program effectiveness.
-
To decide which instructional objectives should be taught at a certain grade level.
The questions on each test of the battery are only a small sample from a very large
number of questions that potentially could be asked. For example, the 29 questions
on the Level 5 Vocabulary test represent a small fraction of the hundreds of words
that could be presented to test the development of students' listening vocabularies.
There is nothing so important about each of those 29 words that teachers ought to
teach them to their students. In fact, such teaching would destroy our ability to
use the test score to generalize about the extent of each student's vocabulary development.
In sum, no test question deals with an essential element of knowledge; each question
is only representative of a larger collection of important elements.
Teachers sometimes wonder whether it is reasonable to expect young children to respond
to the test-taking tasks presented by the Levels 5 and 6 batteries. To help answer
this question, the authors have conducted research involving extensive observations
of young children and their teachers during ITBS test administrations. The observational
evidence demonstrated clearly that, when test administrations are planned and carried
out as effectively as most other instructional activities, students can deal with
the test-taking tasks well. In one study, virtually all of the 750 students from
47 testing sessions demonstrated the ability to attend, to work independently, and
to mark responses properly. (A report of this study is available from Iowa Testing
Programs.) In addition, during test development the authors conduct thorough tryouts
of potential test items to ensure that primary students are able to deal with the
content and processes represented in the final test items. Both the observations
and tryout data have indicated that meaningful information about the achievements
of young children can be obtained with the Levels 5-8 batteries.