In the near future, I hope to teach a
literacy assessment course. As I consider the mandates put forth by the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), I feel concern for the continuation of meaningful classroom literacy instruction and assessment practices. I do not agree with ideas in this mandate that call for only "scientific methods" based on "reliable and replicable methods" of teaching and assessing reading because I believe the definition of what this actually means is too narrow. Reflecting on my own past, I see the blending of instruction and assessment, looking closely at what children already know in order to help them move ahead, and the opportunity to reflect on literacy assessment practices with other teachers as important positives to consider when assessing literacy. The
course syllabus is a product of that history.