Minor area
requirement:12 s.h.
A minimum of 12 semester hours that constitute
a coherent program of coursework outside the Educational
Psychology program and beyond the courses listed
above. The minor area may be in a foundational
discipline such as psychology or in another area
of education such as mathematics education, educational
philosophy, or program evaluation. Coursework
may span departments and colleges as long as it
reflects a plan approved by the student's adviser.
To satisfy this requirement, courses must be listed
at the 200-level or above.
Other Electives: up to 12 s.h.
The semester hours in this category may include
additional coursework from any of the categories
above.
Total hours of required
coursework: 72 s.h.
Second-year research project:
As part of their second year of participation
in the Research in Educational Psychology course,
7P:230, Ph.D. students are required to complete
a research project of modest scope. This project
will be completed under the direction of a faculty
member and presented in both oral and written
form to the program faculty and students. First-year
students may assist second-year students with
data collection and other research activities,
and projects may be designed and conducted in
collaboration with other students. The written
report must be completed by the end of the student's
second academic year in the program. Students
may re-enroll in this course beyond their second
year. Students who enter the Ph.D. program after
having completed an M.A. or M.S. degree with an
acceptable empirical thesis will be exempted from
7P:230 and the second-year research project.
Comprehensive examination:
The Ph.D. comprehensive examination in Educational
Psychology emphasizes competencies rather than
courses. Further, whereas the master's comprehensive
exam emphasizes breadth, the Ph.D. exam emphasizes
depth in one or more narrowly defined areas of
research and theory. There are three options.
Choice among options is made by the student in
consultation with his or her adviser and with
the approval of the examining committee of five
faculty members (which may or may not be the same
as the dissertation committee). The options are
(a) a review article, (b) an extended research
activity, and (c) a traditional comprehensive
examination.
(a) Students who choose this option must first
submit a content outline and brief description
of the proposed integrative review article to
the committee. The committee reviews the outline
and suggests modifications and revision. The student
then independently writes the review article and
submits it to the committee for review. The article
should be integrative and scholarly, should adopt
a point of view with respect to the literature
reviewed, and if possible, should address both
substantive and methodological issues in the area.
The committee evaluates the article and gives
copies of their evaluations to the student. An
oral presentation and defense of the revised article
is then scheduled. When taken together, the review
and the oral exam are intended to be an inclusive
examination over the student's major field of
study, including the tools of research used in
that domain. As a final step, we encourage the
student to discuss with his or her adviser how
the comprehensive exam paper or some modification
of it could
be published in a professional journal.
(b) Students choosing this option must complete
an extended research activity that is separate
from but possibly related to the dissertation.
This research activity must be distinct from the
project completed during the second-year Independent
Research course, but may grow out of it. A proposed
program of research must first be submitted to
the committee and the approval of the committee
obtained. Research activities include independently
conducting and reporting one or more research
studies or developing and validating an instrument.
Research may also be presented at state or national
conferences, or it may be the basis of a grant
submission. A written report of each product or
activity as it is completed in the proposed program
must be submitted to the committee, who will suggest
modifications and revisions. A final document
containing a summary of the project activities
must be distributed to committee members at the
completion of the project. An oral presentation
or defense of the activity is then scheduled.
When taken together, the research activity and
the oral examination are intended to be an inclusive
examination over the student's major field of
study and the tools of research used in that domain.
(c) Students who elect to write traditional comprehensive
exams write nine hours of examinations. The proposed
exam must be approved by the student's adviser
and by the examining committee. The examination
is intended to be an inclusive evaluation of the
student's mastery of the major field of study,
including the tools of research used in that domain.
An unsatisfactory evaluation on a first attempt
at any of the above alternatives allows the individual
student the option of retaking the examination.
A retake of the examination also implies the right
to change the format of the examination. However,
a student may attempt the examination (regardless
of form) only twice. |